Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
629-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

629-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023083 50.880936)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023012 50.880928,-1.023015 50.880942,-1.023025 50.880955,-1.023040 50.880965,-1.023060 50.880971,-1.023082 50.880974,-1.023104 50.880972,-1.023124 50.880965,-1.023140 50.880956,-1.023150 50.880943,-1.023154 50.880929,-1.023151 50.880915,-1.023141 50.880903,-1.023125 50.880893,-1.023106 50.880886,-1.023084 50.880884,-1.023062 50.880886,-1.023042 50.880892,-1.023026 50.880902,-1.023016 50.880914,-1.023012 50.880928)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL